Escaping the Simulation - Q&A

Here I am going to answers some questions about my escaping the simuation video.

Question: If you have very little attachment left and no physical desires and no kids plus can consciously astral travel, would it make it easier or give you an advantage of gnosis at that moment?

I will break this down to cover everything more throughly.

Attachments and physical desires

The material world is a prison.

The true divine realm is spiritual and transcendent.

The Demiurge fashioned the physical cosmos - the Simulation.

Human souls contain a divine spark trapped in matter.

So bodily life isn’t merely distracting - it could be seen as part of the problem.

Bodily desires bind the soul to the material realm.

Sexual desire especially perpetuates entrapment by producing more bodies.

Passion clouds spiritual knowledge (gnosis).

Therefore the most focused of spiritual seekers follow:

- Celibacy

- Fasting

- Strict asceticism

- Avoidance of marriage

The idea isn’t simply moral purity - it is metaphysical escape.

Attachment to:

- Family

- Wealth

- Social status

- Physical pleasure

Is strengthening the illusion of the material world.

Liberation requires:

- Inner awakening

- Detachment from bodily identity

- Realisation of one's true spiritual origin

Some groups (who claim to be Gnostic, like OTO) do the opposite:

- Indulging bodily desire

- Claiming that since matter is meaningless, physical actions do not affect the true spirit

But what they fail to realise is that the more they indulge in those things, the more they want them, addictions grow and ruin you. They take you away from what your true focus should be - escape.

The problem is not pleasure itself.

The problem is identification with the body.

Attachment = forgetting one’s divine origin.

Detachment = remembering it.

Childfree

From my other work you will know I mention this often, that having children is a like continuation of your code, that is DNA, and DNA is the thing that traps you in the simulation. We are our ancestors replicated over and over, with more and more added to it as the program code becomes more and more sophisticated.

Having children means you are adding to this even more, the idea is to stop the line, and therefore stop the suffering. Only then can your true self, your Higher Self, reunite completely and go home to Pleroma.

This is why the older the religion or tradition, the more this is apparent in their teachings, because the older the religion or tradition is the more of the ancient teachings of the Serpent Bloodline they have in them, before they were later corrupted. And the more modern Abrahamic religions; Juadism, Christianity and Islam, all actually encourage procreation, so that shows how corrupted and wrong they have become, trapping everyone here in the simualtion for even longer.

Here I will break down some religions and traditions as examples:

Hinduism

Origins: c. 1500–500 BCE (Vedic period)

The Upanishads introduce renunciation, liberation (moksha), and the idea that worldly life - including family - can bind the soul.

This is where we first clearly see the tension between:

Esoteric: Renunciation as a higher spiritual path, liberation (moksha).

Exoteric: Pro-family householder life, ritual, family lineage, sacred duty (dharma). 

Jainism

Origins: c. 6th century BCE

Esoteric: Strong emphasis on non-attachment and liberation from rebirth.

Monks practise total celibacy.

A much more radical rejection of worldly life for serious spiritual seekers.

Worldly attachment - including family life - is seen as binding the soul to karma.

Procreation can therefore be viewed as deepening worldly entanglement.

Exoteric: Jain householders are permitted to marry and have children.

Buddhism

Origins: c. 5th century BCE

Esoteric: Teaches that life involves suffering (dukkha).

Goal: escape the cycle of rebirth (samsara).

Monastic path requires celibacy.

Attachment (including family attachment) fuels rebirth.

Liberation requires detachment.

Exoteric: It does not forbid laypeople from having children.

Gnosticism (Modern - as the original teachings were not called Gnosticism before this)

Origins: 1st–3rd century CE

Esoteric: Often taught that the material world is flawed or a prison.

Procreation is discouraged, seeing it as trapping divine sparks in matter.

Gnosticism often saw the material world as actively corrupt or evil.

Creating children meant creating more prisons for divine sparks.

Sexual reproduction sustained the flawed cosmic system.

Thus celibacy could be seen as spiritually compassionate - refusing to expand the trap.

Exoteric: Gnosticism has never had an exoteric side, it has always encourage everyone to become a Priest/ess themselves. It never misleads. This is what has always made it so dangerous to those who seek to keep your trapped.

Modern Philosophical Antinatalism

Origins: 19th–21st century

Here the idea becomes not just spiritual renunciation, but an ethical claim that it is morally wrong to create new life because life entails suffering.

This is the clearest “having children is a trap” position - and it is philosophical rather than religious.

Christianity also has its esoteric and exoteric. The Priests are told to not have children and remain celebate, certainly in the first waves from Catholicism, which later became watered down in newer more modern versions, meaning that even their own Priests are having children and the whole religion becomes an exoteric trap.

I think I have made my point though, spirituality is not for the mundane, it is for those who have true Will and focus to escape the trap and one of the biggest most convincing traps of this simuation is the belief that we are only here to have children, the very thing that traps us. Those who can only live in the exoteric can not escape just yet, maybe their children will.

Astral Travel

1. It weakens identification with the physical body.

2. It demonstrates that consciousness is not purely material.

3. It may reduce fear of death.

4. It could provide insight into subtler layers of reality.

However - and this is crucial:

• Experience ≠ liberation

• Insight + detachment = liberation

You can leave your body and still have ego.
You can see heavenly realms and still crave them.
You can gain powers and become more attached.

From a classical spiritual standpoint, astral travel is at best a tool - and at worst, a distraction.

Question: Since you mentioned the Bardo, how is your stand on the 49 days that are mentioned for prayers to reach and guide a deceased loved one?

In Tibetan Buddhism, bardo means “intermediate state.”

It refers to transitional phases of consciousness - the state between death and the next rebirth.

The classic source is The Tibetan Book of the Dead.

Why 49 days?

Traditionally, the post-death bardo is said to last up to 49 days, divided into seven-day cycles.

The idea comes from Tibetan interpretations of Indian Buddhist psychology:

- Consciousness in the intermediate state is unstable.

- It is repeatedly drawn toward rebirth.

- Every 7 days there is a strong karmic “pull.”

- By 49 days, rebirth has almost always occurred.

In Tibetan Buddhist cultures, family and monks perform:

- prayers

- mantra recitations

- merit dedication

- readings from the Bardo Thodol

These are believed to help the deceased by:

- reminding the consciousness to recognise the Clear Light

- reducing fear and confusion

- generating positive karmic conditions

As Gnostic Theolalites our core belief is:

- Ignorance binds the soul; knowledge frees it.

From that perspective:

- If you awaken in life → you can ascend.

- If you remain ignorant → rituals after death have limited power.

In Tibetan Buddhism:

- The dead person can be helped by prayers after death.

- The process is fluid and still influenced.

- Recognition in the moment can change the outcome.

In Gnosticism:

- What matters most is knowledge gained while alive.

- After death, the soul’s fate is largely already determined by its level of awakening.

- External rituals after death play a much smaller role.

- Liberation is front-loaded into life, not managed post-mortem.

Question: Why is it that even the most spiritually mature people suffer so much pain and heartbreak when someone dies that they were deeply connected to?

Deep spiritual maturity does not mean emotional numbness.

It means something much more subtle.

Love creates vulnerability.

When you are deeply connected to someone:

- Your nervous system co-regulates with theirs.

- Your daily rhythms entwine.

- Your sense of self expands to include them.

- When they die, that woven pattern tears.

Spiritual development does not erase attachment bonds formed through biology and shared life. The pain is partly neurological, partly relational, partly existential.

And yes, even enlightened teachers cry when loved ones die.

Non-attachment does not mean:

“I don’t care.”

It means:

“I love without clinging to permanence.”

But even when you understand impermanence deeply, the body and heart still register loss.

The quiet truth - Spiritual maturity doesn’t mean you stop loving deeply.

It means you love deeply knowing it will end in form.

And that knowledge does not cancel the ache when it does.

If anything, it makes the love more luminous - and the grief more honest.

Question: What are your teachings on beloved pets leaving this realm?

Animals are much like humans, some of them have the Inner Divine spark, others are Klum, just run purely from code but with no higher spiritual intelligence.

If a pet has bonded with you they won't be Klum.

Most animals, that are not Klum, have an easier time in the afterlife because they don't get so caught up in the trappings of the material world, but of course each case is different.

Some will return to Pleroma, others might get caught in one of the other traps that prevents them from moving on.

Some pets miss their humans so much and don't want to be parted from them, that can cause them problems because they can he tricked more easily. Some will stay trapped in limbo, watching their humans, trying to comfort them. This is why it is so important that we let them go, as painful as it is.

Most animals know when they are going to die, dogs will want to be alone because your emotional response to them dying will be painful to them and the last thing they want is to upset you.

Them wanting to be alone at the end doesn't mean they don't love you, quiet the opposite. However, some will choose to be with their humans right until the end.

Losing a pet can in many ways be even more painful than a family member, and that is because a human pet bond can become very strong, if you work from home you are with them 24/7, they are always there and then when they are suddenly no longer there the pain can be unbearable.

I know that I will never forget my pets that have passed, especially the dogs. But I have allowed them to move on, even though I didn't want to.

I remember when I lost my dog that I got in the UK and he moved with me to Sweden, he had also travelled through Europe with me in my motorhome, he had been through so many things with me. He was with me all the time. When he died in my arms I never thought I would ever get over it, and I do still miss him, but I know he is ok.

One day I was talking to Tau Graham about him, a few weeks after he passed. I was smiling remembering him, I was slowly coming to terms with his loss. Suddenly a white orb moved right in front of my face, this was in daylight. It floated past me and then dissolved. I knew it was him telling me he is ok and telling me he was going to move on now. I felt great comfort from that.

If you are missing your loved ones and pets that have passed, be comforted in the fact that they do still exist and will always love you, just like you will always love them. At some point you are bound to meet them again in Pleroma.

Question: Are Egregores a natural phenomena, or created by the program?

Egregores are created by human thoughts that are collected together and strengthened the more it is thought about.

An egregore forms when:

• A group concentrates intention.

• Ritual or repeated symbolic action energises an idea.

• Emotional investment reinforces it.

• Members continue feeding it attention.

Over time, it is believed to:

• Develop autonomy.

• Influence members’ thoughts and behaviour.

• Persist beyond individual participants.

They are artificially generated psychic structures.

Beyond ritualistic intentional creation, something functionally similar exists:

• Group identity

• Shared myth

• Collective emotional field

• Cultural narrative

• Institutional personality

For example:

• A nation

• A religion

• A corporation

• A fandom

These are not conscious beings - but they exert real behavioural influence.

Question: Is it possible that an Egregore is aware of someone being aware of it?

An egregore cannot be aware of you because it has no mind of its own. It can be programed to perform tasks, but these tasks are like running a computer program, it cannot think.

Question: Is it possible that Klum are puppeted through the mechanism of Egregores?

You could argue that Klum are programmed to perform certain tasks, so in that way they are similar to egregores, but they are not thoughtforms, they are simply progams.

Question: Does every Egregore have a consciousness of their own, or is there more to it?

They have no consciousness.

Question: Are the thoughts of humans the only aspect that builds an Egregore?

An egregore is not built from thoughts alone.

It is formed and strengthened by:

•  Repeated focused thought

•  Emotion (especially intense collective emotion)

• Ritual repetition Spoken words and symbols

•  Group participation

• Shared intention

Emotion is often considered more powerful than thought.
Attention + emotion + repetition = structure.

If we translate “egregore” into secular language, what we’re really talking about is something like:

• Group identity

• Collective myth

• Institutional culture

• Social narrative

These are not built by thoughts alone either.

They are built by:

• Shared beliefs

• Emotional contagion

• Behavioural reinforcement

• Symbols and imagery

• Architecture and environment

• Media repetition

• Power structures

• Social reward and punishment

For example:

A nation is not sustained by thought alone.
It’s sustained by:

• Flags

• Rituals

• Laws

• Stories

• Shared grief and triumph

• Schools

• Physical borders

Remove behaviour and environment, and the “entity” dissolves.