Wednesday, 27 February 2013

I am tactless, Sorry!



Some people say I am tactless for just speaking my mind. They don't realise my intention isn't to upset people. I say good positive things, and I also say something about things I disagree with, or don't like sometimes. Saying good things is fine, it is giving those who need it, narcissistic supply. But when I make a comment about something I disagree with or don't like, the person often gets very defensive and usually just attacks me.

I am the way I am because I prefer honesty to lies, I speak my mind and give my true opinion.

On Facebook I guess it isn't directly asked for, but then why do people add me to their contact list if they never want to hear my opinion about things?

Did they only join FB to be surrounded by people who will constantly tell them how wonderful they are and always agree with them?

I guess they must.

I think this is the difference between me and them. When I ask someone's opinion about something, I don't do it to get compliments and be told how wonderful everything is. I ask them so I can get their opinions and then I can either see what they mean and make changes and improve it, or say I don't agree and just stick to how it is, but at least they were honest with me.

If I post something on my FB wall and someone comments under it that they don't agree, I will discuss it with them and find out why they think that, and why I don't. I will look at their side and if needs be just accept we are never going to see eye to eye on that point. But I won't instantly hate that person and attack them and call them names because they don't agree with my opinion about something.

On name calling - I don't think calling someone an idiot, stupid, daft or silly is calling them names, it is just an expression for showing you don't approve of what they say. I could change it round to 'that is idiotic' or 'the whole idea is stupid' etc, but it saves time to just say someone is being an idiot. It is not said maliciously, and shouldn't be seen that way. It isn't making a personal insult to someone's appearance or any kind of bullying. You can call me an idiot all you want when you don't agree with me.

I call myself an idiot almost daily when I do absent minded silly, stupid and daft things, and I have a good laugh at myself. So don't be offended when I call you an idiot for doing, thinking or believing something silly, stupid or daft. If you can't laugh at yourself and admit your mistakes, you will never conquer your inner demons. Being an idiot is the human condition, just as much as being great is.
Please try to change your perception of 'tactless' people, as they are just telling you like it is. They are being genuine. They haven't spent hours thinking up what to say, they just say it and they have no ulterior motive.

A troll will just call someone names for no reason, that is completely different. When someone doesn't agree with something, it does NOT mean they are a troll.

Friday, 22 February 2013

Illuminati


I am getting a little tired of people assuming Adam Weishaup invented the word 'Illuminati' or 'Illumination' in 1776, and that even though his organisation later became known as the Freemasons, that they are the only ones who use that word and some how own it.

When someone is illuminated it means they know the truth. It does not mean they are evil, knowing the truth does not make someone evil. What the person chooses to do with their knowledge could though be seen as either good or evil.

Long before Adam Weishaup there were - The Alumbrados (Illuminated) which was a term used to describe practitioners of a mystical form of Gnosticism in Spain during the 15th-16th centuries. The Alumbrados held views that were clearly heretical. Consequently, they were firmly repressed and became some of the early victims of the Spanish Inquisition.

However where did they get their Gnostic teachings from? The Serpent Bloodline Mystery Schools of course. The Alumbrados were those who had tried to infiltrate Christianity and the Jesuits to bring the true teachings of the Serpent Bloodline. But when they were found out they were burnt at the stake. Sound familiar? Yes, it also happened to the Cathars in France and the 'true' Templars, who were Gnostics NOT Christians.

So quit throwing the word 'Illuminati' around like you know what it means, when you clearly don't.

Saturday, 16 February 2013

Is being homosexual an obstacle?


I get asked a lot of questions all the time through email, and when I answer I am answering only one person at a time. So now I will post questions and give my answers here.

Question: Do you think being homosexual is an obstacle for spiritual growth?

Answer: One could argue that any kind of 'sexual' is an obstacle, as lust is one of the things a spiritually aware person conquers and so can not be controlled by it.

If you are happy alone and feel complete alone, you are balanced. If you do not feel complete without this lust, then it will stop you progressing past the material world. People can use this against you, it can become an addiction and can stop you spiritually 'growing up'.

Of course a gay male will struggle more reaching illumination as he would not like to perform the Great Rite with a female, and unlike the assumptions of Aleister Crowley a gay male sexual act can not achieve illumination.

So therefore the male homosexual must find a path to enlightenment alone and in solitude and this is the origins of the gay celibate Priesthood. Only not all those who go into the Priesthood are ready to conquer their lust, and it has led to the abuse of children.

If you can not conquer your lust, this is the obstacle to spiritual growth for all, not just homosexuals.


Monday, 11 February 2013

Grimoire


The Occult word "grimoire" or book of spells means "grammar" which also tells us that "spells" are to do with putting letters together for "spelling" words or forming conceptual ideas for the purpose of raising another person's conscious awareness.

Also see http://www.templeoftheola.org/sigilisation.html

Monday, 4 February 2013

Satanic Psychopaths?




So many complete ignorant fools throw the word 'satanic' about, without even knowing what it means and why it was demonised by patriarchy. Like mind controlled minions they just listen to the perverted preachers at Church and continue to spread their lies. Calling anyone who is a psychopath 'satanic' because of the fact that they are stupid enough to believe Satan is some kind of beast with a forked tail that psychopaths worship and sacrifice babies to. The masses need to grow up and quit being so deluded.

Psychopaths are psychopaths because of issues with how their brain works, not because they worship some imaginary devil. We are not in the dark ages now. Some people are just bad through and through, they don't care about anyone but themselves. Deal with this fact instead of trying to imagine it is something humans are not capable of. 666 is the number of the Beast, the beast is man, this is why Aleister Crowley called himself the beast, he knew this.

To find out more about Satan & Lucifer see http://www.templeoftheola.org/satan--lucifer.html