Pages

Thursday 25 July 2024

Royalty Origins


Today's royals are not the old royals. Royalty didn't used to have anything to do with winning battles, fratricide or wanting to gain as much power and resources as possible.

We are often told that the concept of royalty is centuries old. It originated with the feudal systems of medieval Europe. Under feudalism, there were a few very powerful landowners who acquired large amounts of territory through military force or purchase. These landowners became high-ranking lords, and one of them was crowned king.

Before that, Plato and Aristotle considered aristocrats to be those who are morally and intellectually superior, and therefore fit to govern in the interests of the people. The term has come to mean the upper layer of a stratified group. Most aristocracies have been hereditary, and many European societies stratified their aristocratic classes by formally titling their members, thereby making the term roughly synonymous with nobility. 

And yet it goes much further back.

Some of the oldest recorded and evidenced monarchies were Narmer, Pharaoh of Ancient Egypt c. 3100 BCE, and Enmebaragesi, a Sumerian King of Kish c. 2600 BCE. From earliest records, monarchs could be directly hereditary, while others were elected from among eligible members.

In ancient times within the Serpent Bloodline tribes the aristocracy did mean just that, the tribe leaders were chosen on merit, knowledge, wisdom and spiritual attainment, and therefore were the best leaders. It had nothing to do with who had won a war and who was the most nasty and brutal. It was about who was noble, fair, kind and balanced. Maybe now you can see how the aristocracy and royalty have truly been taken over by the frauds of oligarchy.

You do not have to be of the Serpent Bloodline to be part of the real aristocracy and spiritual royalty, you simply have to be the right kind of person, who is doing the Great Work, wishes to improve themselves and help others. To encourage the noble ideals of Chivalry and to promote “Nobility through deeds of Charity & Honour”. To support the poor, the sick, and the unjustly accused, to stand against oppression and to protect Freedom & Liberty. That is what makes a good leader, and a member of the aristocracy and royalty, nothing else.

Modern "royal" families are only there because someone in their family line murdered someone else so their line could gain the titles. Does that really make a good leader? Do they deserve our support, admiration and money to support their lavish lifestyles?


Saturday 6 July 2024

Autism in The Serpent Bloodline


This normal was decided upon by the think tanks, normal is compliant and uninteresting, normal is good citizens who will just do as they are told, keep paying taxes and perpetuate the problems with the system, because they are content with the distractions they have been given. And although they might appear as friendly and cheerful, just watch them change when they see someone who is not toeing the line like they do. Their wrath will come blaring out. How dare someone have a mind of their own. This rage and anger they direct at the person who is "different" is actually their deep-seated fear coming to the surface because they know there is something fundamentally wrong with society but they are too scared to rock the boat and do anything about it themselves, and so they demonise anyone who could cause them to have to face the facts. Because despite their cheerful mask, they live in a constant state of fear. They fear not being normal, of being rejected.Someone posted a link in our Discord server, it was an article about how a Neanderthal gene is being linked to autism. Now this is a controversial topic that always gets the backs up of the woke crowd, but I think someone needs to say this. If you are easily offended or enjoy being labelled as broken or wrong in some way, this video isn't for you.
Autism was supposed to be a more politically correct way of saying the R word, or any one of the words used to describe those who are mentally challenged. Because eventually, they all start to be used as an insult.

However, it has now become a catch-all phrase used to describe anyone who has a personality or traits considered not "normal". 

So what is normal? Who decided what normal should be?

Normal is considered someone extroverted, someone who is always cheerful and has a lot of friends because they just seem to have a gift for getting along with people. They always seem to say the right thing and are sure to keep abreast of the latest politically correct terminology, they back all the most popular causes, work a typical boring 9-5 job, are married with one point two children, or identify as one of the many strange new genders and talk endlessly about what their pronouns are, like anyone cares and they seem to be oblivious to what is really going on in the world, they just follow the crowd and trust the government and doctors.


And so they decide to give labels to these people who dare to be different. Labels like: rebel, delinquent, outcast, loner, weirdo, loser, social reject, ADHD, autistic.

And so it began, people who have a mind of their own have started to be labelled mentally ill. Can you not see this? Maybe you who is watching this now have taken on this label and have been told how freeing it will be to have an excuse for being different.

So that when you are interacting with these "normal" people and they start to think you are strange and eccentric, you can just say "Oh I am autistic" then the "normal" person can feel better about the fact that you have something wrong with you and that is why you can think for yourself, that is why you refuse to toe the line. So they can breathe a sigh of relief and continue being "normal".

What kind of world do we live in where the people who can think for themselves are labelled mentally ill and the ones who can't think are considered normal? A messed up one for sure.

If you are strong in Serpent Bloodline genes you are much more likely to be given this label and that is for many reasons which I will explain now.

Serpent Bloodline people have a tendency to be introverted and there is a good reason for this.
All our senses are much more acute than they are in modern humans.

Our blue eyes struggle in bright light, our hearing is so sensitive that cities and crowds can easily overwhelm us, and our sense of smell is so keen that we can literally smell the fear, lust or other emotions on people, making a room full of people extremely overwhelming to our senses. Top this with our extremely sensitive skin that detects even the slightest touch, being constantly nudged and brushed past in a crowd is just too much for us.

This does not mean there is something wrong with us, it just means that noisy crowded places are hell to us. We prefer silence and the sounds of nature to hustle and bustle, traffic, lawnmowers and other sounds. Those things hurt us, and cause headaches and earache, and we can do without it.

There is also another reason. Our brains just don't work the same way modern human brains do.

We are told that in humans each side of the brain is responsible for different things and when the link between each side of the brain has been split in some patients this creates two different personalities. One talks, while the other reasons etc.

However, in Serpent Bloodline brains both sides are working the same way together. This is why someone strong in Serpent genes is more likely to have dyslexia and be ambidextrous. We often confuse our left and right because to us they are more similar. Words or letters are sometimes written backwards and sometimes lines of writing can be hard to follow.

When a neophyte does magick training they are taught techniques to try to equalise their brains in this way by writing with their left hand, and writing backwards. This strengthens the link between each side of the brain making it easier to do the Great Work, which does not come so naturally to those who are not strong in Serpent genes.

When the brain of a modern human is split in two something strange occurs. They can see things at one side of a focal point and say what it is, but if the object is to the left of the focal point they cannot say what it is, if asked they will say they didn't see it. However, if you give them a pen and tell them to draw something with their left hand, they will draw the image they said they couldn't see. This is because they are unaware of what is happening in their subconscious mind.

The Great Work teaches how to connect to it fully so that you can become aware of those things consciously. This is something those of the Serpent Bloodline genes already do, even though we live in a society that purposely tries to put that back to sleep.

If the brain of a Serpent Bloodline person was cut in two, it would make no difference, they would still be able to see and name items from both sides of a focal point.

This is a very difficult subject to put into words, but I suggest you do some of your own research into this split-brain phenomenon. The splitting of the brain is used as a treatment for epilepsy.

And so just because someone appears to be socially awkward, introverted, hypersensitive to sights and sounds, has unusual savant-type abilities or is just a bit eccentric, it does not mean they are mentally ill, mentally disabled or have a personality disorder.

Don't take on these labels simply because you are different. There is nothing wrong with you, but you can bet there is something wrong with the ones pushing you to have these labels.

Thursday 4 July 2024

The dark and eerie history of immurement

The dark and eerie history of immurement, the chilling act of entombing someone alive to face a slow, agonizing death, stretches back to the days of ancient Rome.

In this grim past, young girls from noble families were chosen to serve as Vestal Virgins, tending the sacred fire of Vesta, the goddess of hearth and home. These priestesses were bound by a stringent vow of celibacy.

Breaking this vow didn’t result in a mere execution; it triggered a fate far more harrowing. Since spilling the blood of a Vestal Virgin was strictly forbidden, a ghastly alternative was conceived.

A small underground vault, barely furnished with a couch and a scant supply of food and water, would be prepared. The guilty priestess was led to this dismal chamber, sealed inside, and abandoned to endure a drawn-out, excruciating demise.

This punishment was a grim reminder of the price of transgression and the macabre ingenuity of ancient justice.