The Motherhood Mandate: Not All Women Are Maternal

The expectation that all women should be maternal is neither natural nor inevitable. Rather, it is the product of deeply rooted historical and sociological forces that have long linked femininity to caregiving. This phenomenon, often described as the “motherhood mandate”, positions nurturing, self-sacrifice, and domestic responsibility as defining features of womanhood. Despite social progress and expanding opportunities for women, this mandate continues to shape cultural norms, personal expectations, and institutional structures, often to the detriment of women who do not conform to it.

As a woman who has never wanted children, does not particularly enjoy being around them, and has no desire to take on caregiving roles, I am frequently met with anger when I fail to meet expectations imposed on me. That experience is what compelled me to address this topic.

At the heart of this expectation lies the historical construction of gender roles. In many societies, particularly in the West, the division between public and private spheres solidified during the industrial era. Men were associated with paid labour, politics, and public life, while women were relegated to the domestic sphere and made responsible for child-rearing, emotional labour, and household management. Motherhood became not merely something women did, but something women were. Femininity itself was redefined around reproductive and nurturing capacities, making maternal behaviour appear synonymous with womanhood.

This historical framing persists in modern social structures. Even as women participate fully in education and the workforce, they are still expected to shoulder the majority of caregiving labour. Studies consistently show that women perform more unpaid domestic and emotional work than men, regardless of employment status. The motherhood mandate thus functions as a form of invisible labour expectation, one that is moralised rather than negotiated. Women who embrace motherhood are praised for fulfilling their “natural” role, while those who resist or reject it are often framed as selfish, incomplete, or deviant.

A key mechanism sustaining this mandate is the myth of an innate “maternal instinct”. Popular discourse frequently suggests that women are biologically predisposed to nurture, love children unconditionally, and find fulfilment in caregiving. While caregiving abilities can certainly be developed, the notion that they are instinctual and exclusive to women lacks scientific grounding. Research in psychology and neuroscience shows that nurturing behaviours are shaped by socialisation, experience, and context, not sex alone. Men and child-free women are all capable of profound care, yet cultural narratives continue to present maternal instinct as both universal and compulsory for women.

This myth is reinforced through cultural media. Films, television, literature, and advertising regularly portray motherhood as a woman’s ultimate purpose or emotional climax. Female characters who reject motherhood are often punished narratively and depicted as cold, damaged, or later “redeemed” by embracing maternal roles. Conversely, men are rarely defined solely by parenthood. Fatherhood is treated as an addition to identity, not its foundation. These asymmetrical portrayals normalise the idea that a woman’s value lies in her capacity to care for others, particularly children.

Patriarchal social structures further entrench these expectations. When caregiving is feminised, it becomes devalued economically and socially. Unpaid domestic labour is rarely recognised as work, yet it underpins entire economies. By framing caregiving as women’s natural duty rather than skilled labour, patriarchal systems absolve institutions and men of responsibility for providing adequate support, such as affordable childcare, parental leave, or flexible working arrangements. The motherhood mandate thus operates not only as a cultural belief, but as a structural mechanism that maintains gender inequality.

Challenging the motherhood mandate requires disentangling femininity from caregiving. This does not mean devaluing motherhood or maternal labour, but rather recognising it as one valid path among many, not a moral obligation tied to gender. True reproductive and personal freedom includes the right to embrace motherhood, reject it, or redefine it on one’s own terms. It also requires broader cultural shifts, including representing diverse forms of womanhood in media, redistributing care work more equitably, and dismantling the idea that nurturing is inherently female.

Ultimately, the expectation that all women should be maternal is less about biology than about power. It reflects a long-standing social order that benefits from women’s unpaid labour, emotional availability, and self-sacrifice. By naming and interrogating the motherhood mandate, we create space for more expansive and humane understandings of femininity. These allow women to be caregivers, creators, leaders, or none of the above, without having their worth called into question.

In ancient times when their where only Serpent Bloodline women and no men, women got to choose their roles, some of the women wanted to look after the childten, others wanted to hunt, others gather, others make clothing, and sometimes a good mix of them all. No one was forced into roles they did not naturally feel drawn to. The Motherhood Mandate is a modern idea that has been used to keep women out of the way.

So please, don't just expect that a woman with a soft voice and a curvious feminine body wants to mother you and your children, for some us it is simply not what we are made for.

The Gnostic View of Consciousness - Four Types of Human

Humanity is not a single, unified species.

It is threefold. However, there is another type caught between two of the types.

Most people, belong to a type that will never truly awaken.  Because they were designed that way - shaped to consume, to obey, to move through life without ever asking the kinds of questions that fracture illusion.

If you are here reading this, if something compelled you to stay, then you are likely not one of them. And that, in Gnostic terms, makes you a serious threat.

These revelations are so dangerous to the control system that they have purposely been hidden for thousands of years. 

You see - not all humans are the same.

Humanity exists in three distinct categories with three types of consciousness, three levels of spiritual potential. And the disturbing implication is that only one of those types has any genuine chance of escaping what they understood as the prison of this world.

We are not speaking of race, or class, or intelligence. We are speaking of essence - of what animates a person from within.

This three types the Klum, the Simples, and the Theolalites. Then there is the confused mixed type which are the Eagles. Each operates at a fundamentally different level of awareness. Most people have never encountered these terms, and most will live their entire lives without ever asking which category they belong to. But once you understand what the Gnostics were really describing, once the pattern becomes clear, it is impossible to unsee. You begin to recognise these types everywhere - in your family, your workplace, in the crowds that fill the streets. And gradually, the world itself starts to make more sense.

Let us begin with the first group: the Klum.

The term comes from the Hebrew, כלום (klum) technically means "something" or "anything," but it's almost always used with a negative verb (like "ein" or "lo") to mean "nothing," 

The Klum are entirely rooted in the material world. This is not a moral judgement. We don't see them as evil, or even as lesser in a conventional sense. But the Klum lacks the divine spark - the spiritual essence that connects a being to higher reality.

The Klum lives through the senses alone: appetite, instinct, immediate gratification. There is little reflection, no sustained questioning. Life is about survival, consumption, reproduction, and eventual decay. To the Gnostics, the Klum moves through existence almost automatically - not as a machine in a literal sense, but as a being who never truly wakes up.

They follow trends without questioning. They accept authority without resistance. They pursue pleasure and avoid pain, yet never pause to ask what lies beneath the surface of experience. For them, this world is all there is - and they are content with that.

The Gnostics believe the Demiurge - the creator of the material cosmos - fashioned the Klum precisely this way. They are the workers, the consumers, the foundation upon which the material system depends. They do not rebel, because rebellion requires an inner spark they do not possess. This, again, was not condemnation - merely observation.

Without the Klum, the machinery of society would collapse. They build the cities, staff the factories, keep the systems running - all without wondering whether there might be something more.

The second type is more complicated - and more deceptive. These are the Simples.

The word comes from Simian and People combined. Unlike the Klum, the Simple possesses an inner life. They feel guilt and hope, fear and longing. They reflect. They ask questions. But - and this is crucial - they never ask them deeply enough.

Simples are religious. They believe in God. They speak of morality, ethics, and higher purpose. But they accept answers from external authorities - priests, scriptures, traditions, politicians - structures that were themselves established by the Demiurge.

Simples believe they are awake. In truth, they are dreaming.

They worship what they believe is the true God, but are in fact venerating the Demiurge. They are convinced that obedience will save them, unaware that obedience is precisely what keeps them bound. They mistake borrowed belief for inner knowing, false light for true illumination.

Simples possess the capacity for gnosis - direct experiential knowledge - but they outsource their spirituality. They surrender authority to intermediaries, to institutions that claim exclusive access to truth. And so they remain trapped in cycles of belief and illusion, convinced that one more lifetime of devotion will finally deliver salvation.

The Gnostics regard Simples as tragic figures. They are close - painfully close - yet restrained by the very systems they defend. They often argue passionately for their chains, protecting the institutions that imprison them, and responding with fear or hostility toward anyone who questions those structures. To question the system is to threaten their identity - something the Simple mind cannot tolerate.

And then there is the third type: the Theolalites

This is where everything changes.

Theolalites are not merely animated by soul, but by spirit - by the same substance that flows from the Pleroma, the realm of true light beyond the Demiurge’s reach.

They are rare. They always have been.

Throughout history, Theolalites have appeared as mystics, heretics, and relentless seekers - individuals who could not accept inherited answers. They carry an unshakable sense that something is fundamentally wrong with the world. That the stories do not add up. That authority is lying. That a deeper truth exists beneath the surface - and they will not rest until they touch it.

Theolalites struggle to fit into the system. Many try for years. They attempt belief, conformity, normality. But there is always friction - a sense of displacement, of living in a world not designed for them. Eventually, they stop trying to belong and turn inward.

They begin the search for gnosis - not belief, not faith, but direct knowing. And once even a glimpse of that knowing is tasted, there is no returning to sleep.

Theolalites are the greatest threat to the Demiurge. They cannot be bribed with pleasure like the Klum, nor pacified with religion and politics like the Simples. They see through illusion. They recognise the Eagles (the fourth type we will come to soon)  for what they are. They understand this world as a counterfeit - a shadow of something infinitely greater - and they refuse to bow to its false god.

This is why Theolalites have always been persecuted. This is why Gnostic texts were burnt and teachers silenced. A world filled with awakened Theolalites is a world in which the Demiurge loses power.

The Theolalites are stong in certain genetics, that of the anicent Serpent Bloodline, they can access their genetic memories that the other types can't.

Then there is the fourth type, the Eagles. These are a mix of all 3 of the other types which leads to absolute confusion and chaos within their own psyche. They do possess a soul and a Divine spark that could be ignited if they knew how. But for most doing so will be impossible. They are very much trapped in the spoils of the material world which makes them seek power, money and control. They also enjoy the hierarchy and power structures that the Simples do. But they also know there is more, and some of them only try to gain spiritual knowledge as a way to try and continue on this current timeline, without losing their gainend power aand weatlth, because they know they can never win this game. There will always be a day when they have to leave everything they have built here behind. They cling to life here, cling to as much wealth and power as they can, but ultimately they will fail.They will never activate their Divine light because they are too busy trying to control everyone else.

The Eagles are the hidden hand, running the world from behind the scenes, using Klum and Simples as puppets in their sycophantic power games. But they cannot control the Theolalites, which is why they seek to destroy them.

So how do you know which type you are?

If you are asking the question at all, you are not Klum. The Klum never wonders. They do not seek hidden knowledge. They are content with the surface.

The real distinction lies between Simples and Theolalites.

The Simples look outward for truth - to teachers, books, systems, politics. They want to be told what is real. The Theolalites know that truth cannot be given. It can only be remembered. It emerges through direct experience, in silence, beyond language.

If you have felt like an outsider your entire life - if you have questioned everything, even when it cost you relationships or belonging - that is the mark of the Theolalite.

If you have felt a longing for something you cannot name, a homesickness for a place you have never seen, that is the divine spark calling you back to the Pleroma. When you look at the world and feel, This cannot be all there is, you are hearing the call of your true origin.

But the world is designed to suppress this awakening.

Every system, every institution, every distraction works to keep the Theolalite from turning inward. The Demiurge understands that awakened consciousness is the only real threat. So they flood the mind with noise, entertainment, conflict, fear - anything to keep attention outward. They send corrupt ideas to the minds of Klum, Simples and Eagles as ways to suppress the rising Theolalites.

For many Theolalites, the spark remains dormant for an entire lifetime. They feel the friction but never name it. They sense the wrongness but never find its source.

This is why Gnostics place gnosis above all else. Not faith. Not obedience. But direct knowing - knowledge that cannot be taught, only awakened. The moment you truly see, the prison dissolves, because the prison is not matter. It is belief.

It is made of stories about who you are, where you came from, and what you are allowed to be. When those stories fall away, when attention turns inward and touches the spark the Demiurge cannot reach, the walls begin to crumble.

Gnostics don't see these types as a hierarchy of worth, but as a map of consciousness. The Klum is trapped in matter. The Simple is trapped in belief. The Eagle is trapped in confusion. The Theolalite is awakening to truth.

Most people will never awaken. Awakening requires solitude, uncertainty, and the willingness to release everything familiar.

Most choose comfort over truth.

If you are here, listening, still engaged, then something within you is already stirring. Whether you stand at the edge of awakening or are beginning to remember, the call has begun. And once it begins, it does not stop.

The question is not whether the spark exists - but whether you will listen.

Because that remembering is the first step toward freedom.

Is Christianity Gay? The Erasure of the Divine Feminine

If you are familiar with my work you will know that in my book I talk about ancient Greece and that "Agape" which was known as the highest form of love was that of older men with young boys. I also explain how this tradition carried on into Rome, the Catholic Church and spread out through the whole of Christianity, but as I talk about this topic please realise the same is true of Islam, Judaism and all mainstream religions.

What happens when a religion removes the divine feminine and reorganises love, loyalty, and devotion almost entirely around men?

Christianity is profoundly homosocial in an emotional, relational, and spiritual sense.

And once you see that, you can’t unsee it.

---

The Love Ethic of Patriarchy

Under patriarchy, men are not taught to love women.

Men are taught to:

• manage women

• possess women

• protect women

• control women

• extract labour, sex, reproduction, and emotional service from women

But love - real love - emotional intimacy, vulnerability, devotion, loyalty - is reserved for other men.

Patriarchy, is fundamentally a male love system.

Christianity, particularly patriarchal and conservative Christianity, maps perfectly onto this structure. As does Islam and Judaism. 

---

Christianity as a Male Love Economy

Look at where emotional and spiritual devotion flows in Christianity:

• Love God the Father

• Worship Jesus the Son

• Follow male apostles

• Obey male pastors, elders, bishops

• Admire great men of faith: Abraham, Moses, David, Paul, Peter

Women appear - but never as the primary subjects of love.

They are:

• helpers

• helpmeets

• wombs

• servants

• symbols of purity or temptation

• background labour

They are necessary, but never central.

Christianity’s deepest emotional attachments are male-to-male and male-to-God.

This is what I mean by homosocial.

---

“But What About Mary?”

Every time this argument is made, someone says: What about Mary?

Mary is not honoured as a woman.
She is honoured as:

• a vessel

• a womb

• obedience

• virginity

She has no theology.
No authority.
No wisdom tradition.
No autonomy.

She exists because of what she carries - not who she is.

Mary is not a divine feminine. She is a workaround for its absence.

And historically, she functions as an emotional salve in a religion dominated by terrifying fathers, hell imagery, and violent masculinity - not as a full goddess.

Compare Mary to pre-patriarchal goddesses:

• complex

• embodied

• powerful

• destructive and creative

• sexual and wise

Mary is not that.

---

Male Loyalty Over Women

Christianity consistently prioritises male loyalty over loyalty to women.

When men betray women:

• churches cover it up

• men protect men

• wives are told to forgive

• women are blamed for not being “gracious”

When women withdraw loyalty:

• they are punished

• shamed

• exiled

• spiritually condemned

Devotion flows upward:

• woman → husband

• husband → pastor

• pastor → Jesus

• Jesus → God

Rarely - if ever - does it flow back down.

This is not mutual love.
It is extraction.

---

Saying the Quiet Part Out Loud

Listen to religious men talk about women and you can see this because they articulate what is usually implicit.

They openly:

• mock heterosexual relationships

• frame women as distractions

• glorify male brotherhood

• position women as threats to male cohesion

They do not like women.
They do not see them as people.

When asked:

• Are you attracted to women? → “Yes.”

• Are you gay? → Long pause. Discomfort. Deflection.

What they admit openly is this:

They feel safer with men.
They are loyal to men.
Women exist to serve the male project.

This is the typical caricature of patriarchal Christianity.

---

Compulsory Heterosexuality

Patriarchy does not force heterosexual marriage because men love women.

It forces it because women are a resource:

• reproductive

• sexual

• emotional

• domestic

Men love men.
Men are loyal to men.
Men build worlds with men.

Women support that world from below.

---

Christian Nationalism Is Not a Spiritual Movement

Christian nationalism is not about Jesus.
It is not about the Sermon on the Mount.
It is not about compassion.

It is a male identity project reacting to feminism.

It offers:

• male belonging

• male hierarchy

• male obedience

• male worship

Women are defined only in relation to men.

That is why it skews overwhelmingly male.
That is why it is panicking.
That is why it is obsessed with controlling women’s bodies.

---

Homosocial Desire and Homophobia

This system requires intense homophobia.

Patriarchal societies depend on emotionally charged male bonding.
But that bonding must never become erotic.

Why?

Because erotic male love destabilises hierarchy.

So:

• men are trained to love men

• but taught to fear that love

• women are inserted as erotic outlets

• homophobia polices the boundary

This is why the most homosocial cultures are the most homophobic:

• Sparta

• Victorian England

• Evangelical America

Christianity produces homoerotic intimacy - and then punishes it.

---

The Bible Knows This

David and Jonathan:

“Your love to me was wonderful, more wonderful than the love of women.”

We do not see equivalent language describing male love for women.

Christian art is saturated with:

• wounded male bodies

• male devotion

• male ecstasy

• the Church as Bride to Christ

This is a religion of male emotional communion.

---

Why Women Leave

Women leaving Christianity often say the same thing:

“I never felt like a real person.”

They were given:

• service

• duty

• moral labour

But never love.

Christianity cannot survive women being whole.
It cannot survive women being embodied.
It cannot survive women being divine.

That is why it is panicking.

---

Decentring Jesus

Many people leaving Christianity try to take Jesus with them.

But eventually a question arises:
Why do we worship traits in Jesus that we dismiss in women?

If Jesus were a woman:

• kind

• forgiving

• gentle

• intuitive

She would be ordinary.
Not divine.

Patriarchy values femininity only when it comes with a penis.

That realisation is what forces Jesus off the centre.

---

Why This Lens Matters

So is Christianity gay?

Not sexually.
But structurally.
Emotionally.
Spiritually.

It is a homosocial religion that:

• centres men

• worships men

• loves men

• fears male eroticism

• exploits women to sustain itself

Once women stop supplying the labour, the silence, the obedience - the system collapses.

And that is what we are watching happen right now.

The Ancient Rh Negative Bloodline and Dolphins

I want you, for a moment, to forget the neat diagrams you were shown as children - the tidy ladders of evolution, the arrows marching obediently from ape to human, land to land, certainty to certainty. Those diagrams were never meant to tell the whole story. They were meant to keep it manageable, or maybe even to mislead you and to hide our true history.

What I am about to describe is older than writing, older than language as we now understand it. It is carried not in books but in blood, in instinct, in the way your breath changes when you enter the sea.

Long before we called ourselves human, before we built fires or named the stars, our rhesus negative ancestors were something else entirely. You will find them described in academic terms as aquatic apes, a hypothesis often dismissed with a polite smile. But hypotheses are merely ideas waiting for courage.

These beings walked upright not because the land demanded it, but because the water did.

They lived at the edge - estuaries, lagoons, warm coastal shelves - where land softened into sea. Their bodies adapted accordingly. Fat distributed beneath the skin for warmth and buoyancy. Breath held longer than any land ape’s. Hair forming a widow's peak because water does not forgive drag. Their infants were born helpless, yes - but already knowing how to float.

And in those waters, they were not alone.

The dolphins were already there.

Highly intelligent, exquisitely social, masters of a realm our ancestors were only beginning to enter. At first, the relationship was cautious. Curiosity from a distance. A fin breaking the surface. An eye, dark and reflective, watching from below.

But hunger is a powerful negotiator.

When our ancestors hunted in the shallows - fish darting through reeds, shellfish buried beneath sand, larger prey moving in schools - they were vulnerable. Their eyes were adapted for air, not water. Predators moved unseen beneath them.

The dolphins changed that.

They learnt, as dolphins always do, with astonishing speed. They learnt the shape of these strange upright mammals. Learnt their movements, their rhythms, their patterns of fear and excitement. And our ancestors learnt in return.

The dolphins would herd fish toward the shore, tightening the circle, driving prey into traps of stone and netted reed. They would strike the water sharply with their tails as warning - shark below, danger approaching. Sometimes they would place themselves between the hunters and what hunted them, not out of altruism alone, but because cooperation benefits all intelligent life that wishes to endure.

This was not dominance. It was alliance.

And alliances leave marks.

The most profound of those marks was not in hunting - but in birth.

You must understand how dangerous birth was for an aquatic ape. Although their hips were wider than those of land apes, the upright posture narrowed the pelvis. Large brains enlarged the skull. Labour was long, painful, perilous. On land, birth was agony. In water, it became survivable.

The sea held the body. Reduced gravity. Softened strain. Warmth eased muscle and bone. But even so, fear remained. Pain remained. The unknown always remains.

This is where the dolphins came closer.

Female dolphins would circle birthing mothers. Not touching - never intruding - but sounding. Their sonar pulses, normally used to map the sea, would wash over the labouring body in steady, rhythmic waves. Vibrations deep enough to penetrate tissue, to loosen tension, to distract the nervous system from its own alarm signals.

Pain, as you know, is not merely physical. It is interpretive. Sonar changed the interpretation.

The mothers calmed. Their breathing synchronised - not just with the water, but with the living beings around them. The dolphins vocalised softly, clicks and whistles modulated into patterns we no longer consciously recognise, but which the body still remembers.

Infants were born into sound before sight. Into water before air. Cradled by buoyancy, by rhythm, by a living chorus older than fear.

This was not sentiment. It was survival.

Now, fast-forward.

Tens of thousands of years pass. We leave the water behind - or so we believe. We build cities. We forget the language of currents. We tell ourselves we are creatures of land and fire and stone.

And yet.

Notice how humans respond to water. How the nervous system calms in a bath. How labouring women instinctively seek showers, tubs, warmth, immersion. How water births consistently reduce tearing, shorten labour, ease pain - often without medical intervention.

We explain this in modern terms: buoyancy, temperature, reduced cortisol.

All true.

But incomplete.

Because the body is not merely mechanical. It is historical.

When a woman enters water to give birth, she is not inventing something new. She is remembering something ancient. Her muscles recognise the environment. Her breath changes. Her pelvis opens not just physically, but confidently, as if reassured by something it has done before.

And dolphins?

Even now - rarely, quietly, away from spectacle - there are accounts. Midwives who speak of dolphins appearing near shore during ocean births. Of sonar-like vibrations detected in the water. Of labour progressing more smoothly, mothers reporting an unexplainable sense of safety.

Do not mistake me: I am not suggesting dolphins are magical midwives waiting on call. This is not fantasy in that sense.

It is resonance.

Dolphins are highly sensitive to distress. They are drawn to birth, to transition, to thresholds between states. They recognise vulnerability because they are masters of it themselves. And when conditions allow - when the environment is calm, respectful, non-invasive - they sometimes respond.

Not because they owe us anything.

But because once, long ago, we were kin in the water.

This ancient bond did not disappear. It submerged.

It lives in our breath-holding reflex. In the way newborns instinctively paddle. In the calming effect of rhythmic sound. In our fascination with dolphins that borders on reverence, despite our best efforts to remain rational.

We are taught that evolution moves only forward. But I believe it also moves inward.

Memory does not vanish. It sinks into the body, into the marrow, into the quiet places science has not yet learnt how to measure.

And when we return to water - especially at moments of transformation - the body remembers what the mind never knew.

That, my friends, is why water births feel like coming home.

And why, sometimes, if you listen closely enough, you can still hear echoes of a partnership that helped bring us into the world - long before we ever learnt how to name it.

Escaping The Simulation

 

The Transitional Realm

Upon physical death, consciousness enters what Tibetan Buddhism calls the Bardo, Christianity vaguely calls purgatory, and modern research labels the transitional state.

Here, consciousness exists without physical form.

Experience is shaped almost entirely by:

• Belief

• Expectation

• Emotional frequency

Within moments, approximately 95% of souls perceive a familiar phenomenon:

A tunnel of light.

It appears safe. Loving. Like home.

Often, figures appear:

• Deceased relatives

• Religious icons

• Beings identifying themselves as angels or guides

The emotional environment is overwhelming - peace, unconditional love, acceptance.

According to this framework, none of this is accidental.

The tunnel is described as an electromagnetic capture mechanism.
The beings as adaptive projections.
The emotions as frequency modulation designed to lower discernment.

It works precisely because it aligns with cultural expectation.

But when someone does the Great Work and recognises these traps, they might well fall for one of the other traps of the Demiurge.

The system adapts to confuse.

---

The Secondary Traps

Trap One: The Alternative Light

After refusing the primary tunnel, another light often appears.

Not a tunnel - but a doorway.
Subtle. Refined. Violet or golden.

The beings associated with it speak the language of sovereignty:

• “You were right to refuse.”

• “You are awake.”

• “We will take you to the true exit.”

This is not liberation.

It is role reassignment.

Souls are offered:

• Advanced missions

• Conscious reincarnation

• Leadership roles within the system

The key distinction is simple:

True exits do not come to find you.

Anything that appears automatically is part of the architecture.

---

Trap Two: The Dark Void

Some turn away from all light, entering apparent emptiness.

Initially, this feels liberating.

But remaining passive in the void eventually produces encounters with void entities - figures of authority rather than love.

They present themselves as:

• The true gods

• The architects beyond false light

• The final arbiters of existence

Their leverage is fear - particularly the fear of annihilation.

This, too, is a trap.

Light and void here are two factions of the same system.

---

Trap Three: The Memory Liberation Deception

Some souls are tricked with what they perceive as full memory recovery:

• Past lives

• Pre-birth agreements

• Cosmic identity

This feels like victory.

Then appear “equals”- soul family, companions, collaborators.

The conversation always turns toward one more lifetime.

What makes this trap dangerous is that the memory return is partially real.

The manipulation lies in the interpretation.

True soul family does not pressure.
True choice has no urgency.

---

Trap Four: The Ascension Chamber

A gateway appears.
You are told you have completed Earth cycles.
Ascension awaits.

But this ascension is administrative, not liberatory.

Souls become guides, planners, overseers -
Believing they have escaped while managing the system itself.

Genuine ascension is not conferred.
It is not administered.
It arises internally, beyond system frequency.

---

Trap Five: The Dissolution Offer

The most refined trap offers complete dissolution.

Presented as:

• Nirvana

• Moksha

• Union with the Absolute

But dissolution here is not return to infinite source.

It is absorption into a collective consciousness governing the material realm.

Individual sovereignty is lost permanently.

True reunification occurs only after exiting the entire system.

---

The Navigation Protocol

Liberation is not given.
It is claimed.

Stage One: Orientation

Remain calm.
Internalise awareness.
Affirm sovereignty.

Stage Two: Refusal

Refuse all tunnels, lights, beings, invitations.

Stage Three: Testing

Question all entities.
Demand truth without offence.

Stage Four: Memory Without Interpretation

Accept memory.
Reject imposed meaning.

Stage Five: Heart-Based Navigation

Shift awareness to unconditional love and gratitude.
This frequency cannot be replicated.

Stage Six: Perceiving the True Exit

It does not look impressive.
It feels right.

Stage Seven: Authority

Move forward without negotiation.
Barriers dissolve through certainty.

Stage Eight: The Final Test

Images of suffering.
Appeals to guilt.
You are told you must go back to help others.

Respond with clarity:

“My liberation serves all liberation.”

Stage Nine: Confirmation

Reality changes fundamentally.
Freedom is unmistakable.

---

Conclusion

Those who reject the tunnel without understanding the secondary architecture are caught again.

Those who understand the full system - and navigate with sovereignty and heart-based clarity exit permanently.

You now have the map.

What you do with it, when the moment comes, will be your choice.

A World Ruled By Narcissism

"The mind colours the soul with every thought it holds.

Choose thoughts you would not hesitate to expose to the brightness of truth.

Your character is not fate it is fashioned by your own hand.

With each passing day, the choices you make and the actions you take shape your becoming.

Honour is the thread of destiny, the lamp that lights your way." Tau Tia 2013

My life is what I do. I don’t want all the trappings of the material world. The strange thing is that many people find it difficult to accept that anyone would dedicate their life to a cause, working seven days a week sometimes fifteen hours a day, just because they believe in it. 

The unaware will say there must be a catch. She must be doing it for some kind of gain. 

No.

I’m doing it because before I leave this reality, I want to do everything I can to make a difference. I’m not the one who’ll be still here, living most of their lives in the eternal looping nightmare.

Since when was what you do only about what affects you? Why has narcissism become the norm.

All we here is:  "Me. Me. Me. What’s in it for me? Should I be kind to others? Well, is that kindness going to benefit me? No? Well then I’m too busy with my own concerns…"

I’m just trying to make a difference.

So to those who can’t understand that some people don’t do things for what they get back: the satisfaction comes from making a difference. And I admit at times I do feel like I am not making any difference at all and I do get upset about that, and frustrated, but I carry on, because even unaware ungrateful people are only like that because they are trapped in the material worlds selfish egoism, maybe something I say will help them realise that.

If people spent more time contributing to positive change instead of undermining those trying to help, the world would be a better place.

It’s a bizarre idea that to do anything, you must be doing it for the money, fame or adoration. It’s not true. I’m by no means poor, but over the years there were many periods of earning nothing, surviving on what I’d saved.

But through all those periods, you keep going because you believe in what you’re doing. You find a way.

So don't assume the worst of someone who has nothing other than what you see here, my Gnosis, my passion for truth and my unwavering dedication to revive the memories in those who most of the time don't even know they need to remember.

I am often hearing that those you help are the first to stab you in the back, and this has happened to me so many times over the years. People getting angry at the truth I am sharing, and blaming me for it. People who I thought had become friends just ghosting me because they don't want to work on themselves, or they are trying to project their flaws on to me. I am used that, but it doesn't mean I enjoy it.

It would be so nice if we could all just remember who and what we are and stop allowing the program to corrupt us into selfish, self-centred, narcissists.

How about giving kindness a chance?

Remember, you are Divine, and so am I. I am love, and so are you. Now let's work on living that truth.

Resets Q&A

Here I am going to try to answer some of your questions.

What is the nature of the resets? How is it enacted from within the simulation?

A soft reset or new age is when a new religion comes in and a new deity for that age appears, or the same god but a new "true" prophet. Everyone will think they have finally found the solution to the worlds problems, that this new religion or prophet will save us all. However, this is of course just the same old thing repackaged into something that seems new and shiny. How it manifests depends on what age it is. So where as the Taurean age was bull or cow worship, Arian age was Judaism with their shofar, and Pisces is Jesus the fisher king, the next age being Aquarian will about enlightenment, as the Piscean age is starting to come to an end, more and more people will be rejecting the old religions in favour of enlightenment and this will also correspond with humans finally mastering quantum computing, and creating super AI, and of course at that point the factory reset occurs, which always starts again at Aquarius. The people will be starting again in a naïve enlightenment and fooled by the program, and will have lost all knowledge of the achievements of humans in the past, and will only know about the past from the clues they can dig up.

The hard resets which bring in a new aeon is again not so noticeable because the changes begin to happen gradually until the Aeon is fully brought in and the reset complete.
The factory resets are more traumatic, because the idea is to wipe out all the people and start the program again from the beginning. However, they keep the operating system running and use a "natural" disaster to wipe everyone out and clean up the place for when they restart all the codes that trap our consciousness. At this point our consciousness is put in something akin to cloud storage, but our memories are wiped. However there are ways to survive these if you know when they are coming, which is what our families have done, this is how this information has survived through us.

People get confused and will remain confused about history until they understand this completely. You see, when you first connect to your genetic memories and gain back a spark of true awareness, you are shown how life started on earth, from the first elements that arrived here from stars, to the evolution that led to how we are now. But because of those constant resets it all gets very confusing. Even with a factory reset, they don't want to recreate everything from scratch, they think people are too dumb to ever figure this out, so they only take us back to the stone age, which is why the cycle lasts 25k years and not longer each time, and that is when humans were first starting to be religious and using language and mathematics etc. They are good code packs to trap our consciousness in, but not too bright to cause any problems, and they have 25k years ahead to get back to the point we are closing in on now.

If they want to shut down the simulation completely and start back from cells, they could flash the drive, which would install a new copy of the operating system. But holding the consciousness we have in such basic lifeforms is more difficult, it is much easier to use modern human code packs.
Eagles think they can hide their avatars underground and beat the factory reset. But any code will be removed, you have to know how to get out of your avatar and re-enter after the reset to beat it. But they don't have Serpent Gnosis, and oh gosh, they wish they did.

Why don't the Serpents just leave this place once they are out of their avatars?

Once you have gone back to Pleroma and escaped this simulation it is very difficult to return, but some of us have stayed back, which is why some of our code (DNA) is still in the simulation with full conscious awareness, and that can only happen if you know where to go and how to when the reset is happening and everyone else is in the cloud.

The reason to come back is to try to free as many of those left behind as possible by slowly releasing the teachings bit by bit when the people are ready to hear it. I cannot express strongly enough how dangerous it is for the Serpent Bloodline families to just come out and tell everyone, it could lead to the execution of the entire Bloodline, meaning there is no one left here to help the rest of you escape. The teachings would be lost to you and you would all remain trapped for eternity.

Just imagine how someone would be treated if they just came out with all this information even just a few hundred years ago, well you don't have to imagine, you can see examples of it. All our ancestors who were discovered to be sharing these teaching who were burnt at the stake, persecuted, ridiculed or gagged some other way.

For these teachings to survive, and for you and everyone else to have a chance to have these true undistorted teachings secrecy is very important. The nature of the why it happens would be interesting to explore, is it just the nature of the simulation?

Quite simply, when people advanced to the point where they created Super AI and were starting to realise we are living in a simulation, that is way too dangerous for the Demiurge. It risks everyone learning how to escape, and so the resets are necessary. That is why ancient civilisations were as technologically as advanced as we are, before they were destroyed.

If more people could learn to stay silent about these teachings and use them to escape rather just gossiping and pretending to be spiritual, maybe the resets could be avoided, but modern humans don't seem to be able to keep their mouths shut and seem to hate actually doing anything that involves any effort. So the Demiurge finds out what is happening and puts a stop to it.

What about reincarnation, how does that fit into all this?

I have explained before, there isn't really reincarnation, not like some religions teach. When we have memories they are genetic memories from our code, we are our ancestors, it is the same code. So it isn't a case of us coming back and starting again, because we never left. Our consciousness is not separate from our parents and children, it is one.

However, what can cause confusion is when someone can access the genetic memories from before the factory reset, when our consciousness is placed back in our avatars, but they still carry some of the memories from before.

When someone goes to one of these new age gurus who insist they can delve into the akashic records and tell them who they were in a previous lives they are being conned. These gurus are about as spiritual and switched on as picnic that is short of a few sandwiches. Truly spiritual people don't feel the need to pretend to speak to your dead loved ones or proclaim they can see who you were reincarnated from.

This also goes with hypnosis. I am a hypnotist myself, I know how these new age hypnotists work, when someone is under hypnosis they can be told to go back in time and remember who they were, the person will either just make something up or be tapping into genetic memories. Sometimes they will talk about films they have seen and the hypnotist will be talking to them in a way that makes them believe it was a past life, It just isn't true or reliable.

When I do regression hypnosis or meditations it is to heal trauma passed on through our genetic lines, not to tell you some silly story and mislead you. You have to be so very careful about who you let into your head.

So what happens when we die? How do we escape.

I have tried to explain this before, but it is very complex and difficult for human brains to comprehend, because they can't understand the difference between their personality and programmed ego, to the Higher Self that is connected to all their ancestors. On Earth there truly aren't as many of us as you think, there are a relatively small number of beings whose consciousness is spread out through lots of generations of code.

We have to completely remove all of our code to move on fully. We have to do the Great Work so we can communicate with our Higher Self, then on death we will be taken to the cloud area where we will be shown various things to trap us. Depending on our religion or beliefs will determine what we see. But usually it involves a deity or prophet type figure, our dead loved ones and some kind of life review where we are told how our actions have affected others. You will still believe you are separate from your loved ones, you will still have your ego and so will be easily fooled into accepting that you cannot move on. You are told you have to go back, either back into your old body and come alive again or be reincarnated. However, your personality, ego, memories, whatever you want to call it won't return, you will just continue to be part of the simulation within the code of yours that is left behind. Your memoires shattered.

If you have done the Great Work and are ready to reunite with your whole Divine Higher Self, you will not be tricked by any of the illusions the Demiurge shows you. You will claim yourself as a sovereign being, and won't go down one of those paths it is trying to trick you into taking. You will wait in the dark until you are finally merged back with your true being that is unmistakable, you cannot fail to recognise your true essence and will know you are finally going home. No one but your Higher Self is going to take your back to Pleroma.